{"id":70705,"date":"2023-12-26T08:30:02","date_gmt":"2023-12-26T08:30:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/jackpotland.org\/?p=70705"},"modified":"2023-12-26T08:30:02","modified_gmt":"2023-12-26T08:30:02","slug":"monolithic-vs-microservices-architecture","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jackpotland-org.staticserve.dev\/monolithic-vs-microservices-architecture\/","title":{"rendered":"Monolithic vs Microservices Architecture"},"content":{"rendered":"
As software systems scale in complexity, architects must decide whether a monolithic or microservices architecture is the best choice. This decision greatly impacts system scalability, fault tolerance, ease of development, and more for years to come.<\/p>\n
1. Monolithic Architecture<\/p>\n
In a monolithic design, all critical application components are combined into a single, tightly integrated unit. The components are heavily dependent on each other and communicate via language-level interfaces. The entire software system scales and is deployed as one. Performance can be greatly optimized via shared state and function calls between components. The data model is enforced in a single database.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
2. Microservices Architecture<\/p>\n
The software is split into multiple smaller independent services in a microservices architecture. Each service contains the logic and data to handle specific capabilities. The services run their own processes and communicate via APIs. The services can be developed, tested, deployed, and scaled independently allowing for greater flexibility at the cost of higher network reliability requirements and added complexity of data consistency.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n